Yosemite Fauna on the Up and Up
By By Eric Bailey, Times Staff Writer (Los Angeles Times) - December 5, 2005
Scientists studying the park’s wildlife wonder if global warming is the primary factor spurring a migration of species to higher elevations.
Scientists studying Yosemite National Park’s bountiful wildlife have found that several animal species have moved to higher altitudes, an uphill migration possibly spawned by the grinding effects of global warming on one of the nation’s most protected wildernesses.
The team of scientists from UC Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology made the discovery while retracing the pioneering research of biologist Joseph Grinnell, who about 90 years ago cataloged the park’s menagerie of mammals, birds and reptiles.
Over the last three summers, the Berkeley researchers revisited many of the spots Grinnell plotted in his landmark study. What they found was an environment that has seen a remarkable shift in many of its wild inhabitants.
Several species of small rodents that once lived in Yosemite’s lower elevations have now moved higher up the Sierra’s gnarled granite frontier, in some cases shifting their range by as much as 3,000 feet.
Yosemite Valley, meanwhile, has seen a 50% turnover in the types of birds it harbors, and several species have spread to far higher elevations than ever seen in Grinnell’s day.
Part of the shift, the scientists said, could be explained by natural variations that species see over time, or by alterations in flora and the forest canopy caused by a century’s worth of aggressive wildfire suppression. The California pocket mouse, for instance, may have expanded its range nearly 3,000 feet higher because the chaparral it inhabits has spread farther up the park’s western slope.
But in high-elevation spots where fire is not a factor, several small mammal species have fled farther uphill, prompting researchers to suspect that larger forces are at work.
“I didn’t go into this expecting any shifts, to be quite honest,” said James Patton, the museum’s curator and an emeritus professor of integrative biology. “But the changes are clear-cut. The data record is very strong. While the interpretation as to what these changes mean remains open to discussion, they are consistent with expectations of global warming.”
Several other studies have documented similar environmental changes in the Sierra, among them disappearing glaciers and alterations in the growth pattern of trees in some types of soil.
Over the last century alone, Patton said, the average annual temperature in Yosemite has risen by 9 degrees Fahrenheit.
While most scientists now accept that global warming has been afoot for more than a century, the exact cause of that trend remains a topic of intense debate in academic and political circles.
Many researchers have implicated man-made greenhouse gases as a principal cause, but doubters contend the rise may be a natural climate shift after centuries of cooler weather.
The findings in Yosemite are “consistent with a lot of work with biological species that are adjusting to an increase in temperature,” said William O’Keefe, chief executive at the Marshall Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.
“But you have to say: So what?” said O’Keefe. “Over the centuries there have been periods when it’s been colder, others when it’s warmer. And species adjust. The fact is science can’t distinguish between natural variability and the human contribution.”
Patton and his colleagues have skirted that larger debate while conducting their painstaking review of Grinnell’s original work.
Over the course of nearly four decades, Grinnell visited more than 700 locations around California to establish a bedrock database detailing the state’s fauna.
Along with a team of young scientists, Grinnell compiled 2,000 photographs and 13,000 pages of field notes. In all, they examined more than 20,000 specimens.
Grinnell, founding director of the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, visited Yosemite over several years in the mid-1910s. The volume his team compiled, “Animal Life in Yosemite,” remains “the seminal description” of the park’s fauna, said Leslie Chow, a U.S. Geological Survey wildlife biologist assisting with the new study.
Grinnell’s scientific descendants returned to Yosemite in the summer of 2003 and almost immediately saw that fundamental change had taken place.
The rare Inyo shrew, once found no higher than 8,000 feet, now ranges as high as 10,000 feet, the scientists discovered. The western harvest mouse had moved more than 1,000 feet uphill into Yosemite Valley.
atton said “the big surprise” was the piñon mouse, a ball of fur with Dumbo-size ears that frequents the juniper belt in the eastern Sierra. Known to elevations of 8,000 feet in Grinnell’s day, it now ranges above 10,000 feet at Mt. Lyell and is common at 9,000 feet in Tuolumne Meadows.
While several species expanded their range uphill, a few others have retreated to higher ground.
The Belding’s ground squirrel has disappeared from the lower reaches of its territory of a century ago.
So has the alpine chipmunk, which once ranged as low as 7,900 feet but now can’t be found below 10,000 feet.
Among the most provocative discoveries, Patton said, was the upward retrenchment of the pika, a tiny relative of the rabbit. The pika has little tolerance for higher summer temperatures and is seen by some researchers as a sort of canary in the coal mine for global warming. Once found as low as 7,800 feet by Grinnell, the pika now isn’t found below 9,500 feet in Yosemite.
Chow said genetic drift and natural range extensions could also explain the upward movement of some of the species, but that global warming may well be the primary factor.
“This is another piece of evidence, in addition to melting ice packs, retreating glaciers and elevations in mean low temperatures,” he said.
Still unclear is whether predatory animals are moving uphill. The researchers are reviewing records on the park’s carnivores to determine if they too are shifting ranges.
Carol Boggs, director of Stanford University’s Center for Conservation Biology, called the Yosemite findings “another signpost that global change is having impacts on the flora and fauna, not just changing temperature.”
Boggs noted that other studies have documented biological changes attributed to warming climate — animals and insects showing up at higher latitudes around the globe, plants flowering earlier.
But the Berkeley effort “is particularly strong” because it builds off Grinnell’s meticulous historical snapshot, she said. “His notebooks are absolutely a biological treasure. The fact that people can go back and find the same place really strengthens the inferences we can make.”
Patton said the findings leave him concerned for the future of some of Yosemite’s creatures.
“For species like the alpine chipmunk, there’s no more ‘up’ left,” the biologist said. Few Sierra peaks reach above 14,000 feet. “That’s it; there’s no more room to move higher. If that habitat disappears, the animal could be gone. And it’s never going to be back.”